Local Rings and Nakayama’s Lemma
Definition of local ring and basic properties. Definition of Jacobson radical with elementary criterion. Exercise 1.13. Exercise 4, 5, 6, 7, 9,10,11,12. Nakayama’s lemma and corollaries.
Lemma: Let M be a finitely generated module over A and let I be an ideal of A. If IM=M then there exists an i in I such that im=m for all m in M.
Proof: Let be a set of generators. Since we can write each one as a linear combination of the others . View this as matrices, where the generators are in a column X, we write , and thus X=AX, hence 1X=AX, so . Multiply by the adjoin matrix, and get that the determinant of 1-A annihilates every generator. But the determinant of 1-A is of the form 1-i, where i is an element of the ideal I. So for all i, thus for all m, hence the thesis.
Corollary: (link) Let M be a finitely generated A-module. Every surjective endomorphism is bijective.
Proof: Let be the endomorphism and consider M as an -module via f, i.e., . Let so we have and we know there is a such that for all m. Now suppose . Then
so and the morphisms is injective, therefore bijective.
Nakayama’s Lemma: Let M be a finitely generated module over A and let I be an ideal of A contained in the Jacobson radical J. If IM=M then M=0.
Proof: By the previous Lemma, there is an i in I such that im=m for all m. Thus (1-i)m=0 for all m, but 1-i is invertible, hence m=0 for all m.
References: Atiyah-Macdonald chap 1 & 2, link, link