Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters

Material

Remedies concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements according to Brussels I Recast – Project B IA RE: JUST/2014/JCOO/AG/CIVI/7749 – Coordinator Prof. Dr. Vesna Rijavec, Prof. Dr. Tomaž Keresteš Faculty of Law, University of Maribor

• Case Law and Literature/Judikati in literatura
• CJEU Judgments on Recognition and Enforcement
• Project Results
• CJEU_Judgments_on_Recognition_and_Enforcemen

Jurisprudence relative à la Convention concernant la compétence judiciaire et l’exécution des décisions

• from 1954 to 2009

Literature

Bariatti, Casi e materiali di diritto internazionale privato comunitario, 2°ed., Milano, 2009.

Beaumont, Johnston, Abolition of the Exequatur in Brussels I: Is a Public Policy Defence Necessary for the Protection of Human Rights?, IPRax, 30(2), 2010, pp. 105-110.

Biavati, La realizzazione dello spazio giudiziario europeo di giustizia, libertà e sicurezza: stato attuale e tendenze evolutive alla luce del programma di Stoccolma, Riv. trim. dir. proc. civ. 2013, p. 185.

Cadiet, The emergence of a Model of Cooperative Justice in Europe: Horizontal Dimensions; EUI Centre for Judicial Cooperation, DL 2014/04

Cadiet, Jeuland, Amrani-mekki, Droit Processuel Civil de L’Union Européenne, Lexisnexis, 2011.

Carbone, Il nuovo spazio giudiziario europeo dalla convenzione di Bruxelles al regolamento CE 44/2001, Torino, 2002.

Carratta, La circolazione dei provvedimenti nello spazio giudiziario europeo: il Reg. 44/2001 e le proposte di modifica. Giornata Europea della Giustizia Civile, Roma, 10 novembre 2011, http://www.giustizia.lazio.it/appello.it/form_conv_didattico/carratta_circolazione_44_2001.pdf.

Conseil de l’Europe, Guide pratique de la reconnaissance et de l’exécution des décisions judiciaires étrangères dans le matières civiles et commerciales, Woolwich, London, 1975.

Cuniberti, “The recognition of foreign judgements lacking reasons in Europe: Access to Justice, foreign court avoidance, and efficiency”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2008, 57, pp. 25-52.

European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (a cura di), European Judicial System – Facts and Figures, Strasbourg, 2005.

Freudenthal, The Future of European Civil Procedure, in Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 7.5, disponibile presso il sito http://law.kub.nl/ejcl/75/art75-6.html, 2003.

Gaudemet-Tallon, Compétence et exécution des jugements en Europe : règlement 44/2001 et 1215/2012, Conventions de Bruxelles (1968) et de Lugano (1988 et 2007) 5 ° ed., Paris,  Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2015.

Hess, The Brussels I Regulation: recent case law of the Court of Justice and the Commission’s proposed recast, Common Market Law Rewiew 49: 1075-1112, 2012.

Hess, Pfeiffer, Schlosser, The Brussels I Regulation 44/2001. Application and Enforcement in the EU. Heidelberg Report on the application of Reg. Brussels I in 25 Member States, Veriag C.H. Beck, 2008.

Honorati, Provisional measures and the recast of Brussels I Regulation: a missed opportunity for a better ruling, in Riv. Dir. Internaz. Priv. e proc., 2012, p. 525 ss.

Horn, Review of the Commission Proposal for a Recast of the Brussels I Regulation, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutionals Affairs, European Parliament, 2011.

Jenard, Report on the Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgements on Civil and Commercial Matters, IJ, 1979, C-59/1.

Kennett, The enforcement of Judgments in Europe, Oxford, 2000.

Lupoi, L’attuazione negli altri Stati membri dei provvedimenti provvisori e cautelari nel regolamento Ue n. 1215 del 2012 (Bruxelles I bis) in Academia.edu

Magnus, Mankowski, Brussels I Regulation, European Commentaries on Private International Law, Sellier, European Law Publihers, 2007.

Merlin, Riconoscimento ed esecutività della decisione straniera nel regolamento «Bruxelles», in Riv. Dir. Proc., 2001, 433.

Merlin, Le misure provvisorie e cautelari nello spazio giudiziario europeo, in Riv. dir. proc. 2002, 759ss.

Michaels, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Rüdiger Wolfrum ed., 2009), disponibile presso http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/2076.

Oberhammer, The Abolition of Exequatur, IPRax 2010, 200.

Omar,  Procedures to enforce foreign judgements, Ashgate Dartmouth, 2002.

Pocar, Viarengo, Villata, Recasting Brussels I, Padova, 2012.

Pretelli, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast), European Parliament, 2011.

Schlosser, “The abolition of Exequatur Proceedings – Including Public Policy Review?”, IPRax, 2010, 30(2), pp.101-104.

Silvestri, Recasting Brussels I: il nuovo regolamento n. 1215 del 2012, Riv. trim. dir. proc. civ. 2013, 02, 677.

Tarzia, Nozioni comuni per un processo civile europeo, Riv. dir. proc. 2002, pp. 321 ss.

Timmer, Abolition of exequatur under the Brussels I regulation: ill conceived and premature? In Jour. Priv. Int. Law, 2013, p. 134.

Trocker, La formazione del diritto processuale europeo, Torino, 2011.

Watt, The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (Recast) – Contribution References: REF.: PE 453.199 Study (Note) – JURI – 15-08-2011; European Parliament, 2011.